Secretariat of the Pacific Community / Secrétariat de la Communauté du Pacifique (SPC)

OCEANIC FISHERIES PROGRAMME / PROGRAMME PECHE HAUTURIERE

OFP Home News Staff / Personnel Member Countries / Pays Membres OFP Meetings Jobs / Emplois Links / Liens
WCPFC WCPFC news WCPFC Scientific Committee / Comité Scientifique SCTB SPC

 


Statistics and Monitoring
Statistiques des Pêcheries Thonières

Overview

In-Country Area
Tuna Fishery Data Catalogue

Regional Data Forms

Coverage & Quality of Data


Tuna Ecology and Biology
Ecologie et Biologie du Thon

Tuna Biology and Behaviour
Environmental Relationship & Modelling
Billfish & By-catch
Ecosystem Research
Tuna Tagging


Stock Assessement and Modelling
Evaluation des Stocks & Modélisation

Stock Assessment


Publications and Articles
Publications et Articles

Statistics Publications
Research Publications
Technical Reports
Donors Reports
Other Reports
DIGITAL LIBRARY

| Disclaimer | Contact OFP |
 English       Site en Français

 

Secretariat of the Pacific Community
BP D5, 98848 Noumea
NEW CALEDONIA

Ph +687 262000 - Fx +687 263818 
Email: 
oceanfishATspc.int

 

 

Effect of longlining on pelagic fish stocks - tuna scientists reject conclusions of Nature article

John Hampton, John R. Sibert, and Pierre Kleiber

29/05/2003


[View the document]  (pdf 346k)

Introduction. Myers and Worm (2003) present an analysis of Japanese longline and trawl fishery catch and effort data for various ocean regions dating back to the beginning of industrial fisheries exploitation. Their analysis aggregates catch across species for each fishery type and interprets the aggregate CPUE so obtained as a time-series measure of “community biomass”. Rapid declines in CPUE during the 1950s and 1960s were observed, leading the authors to suggest that “industrialized fisheries typically reduced community biomass by 80% during the first 15 years of exploitation”, and that “large predatory fish biomass today is only about 10% of pre-industrial levels”. In the case of tuna fisheries, in particular the fisheries for tropical tunas, these conclusions are fundamentally flawed. This note reviews the conclusions of Myers and Worm in relation to available data for the Pacific, concentrating on the region west of 150°W (referred to as the western and central Pacific). The comments are grouped under headings that deal with the main issues of concern with the Myers and Worm analysis.