|
|
8th
PPHSN Coordinating Body meeting
The
Coordinating Body (CB) of the PPHSN met on 24–26 July in Noumea, New
Caledonia, immediately after the first LabNet TWB meeting. The development
of LabNet was thus one of the main items discussed.
Participants
were representatives of the 10 CB members —
the five core member countriesFederated
States of Micronesia, Fiji Islands, New Caledonia, Samoa, Solomon Islands
and the five allied members Fiji School of Medicine, NCEPH, SPC, UNICEF,
and WHO —
and also representatives of the Institut Pasteur de Nouvelle-Calédonie,
as a TWB member. Dr Dennie Iniakwala, Undersecretary of Health, Solomon Islands, chaired the proceedings of the meeting.
The issues discussed are detailed below.
How should PPHSN Plan of action
fit in the Health Reform agenda?
(see
following paper)
Dr
M Nuualofa Tuuau Potoi’s presentation and paper were very well received
and commended by CB members. The group recognised that the experience of
Samoa in this area is remarkable and would like to invite other PPHSN
countries exposed to the Health Reform process to produce such papers to
advocate for PPHSN advantages at national level. Training
Where
are we at regarding the PPHSN Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP)?
Fiji
School of Medicine (FSM) progress:
The arrival, last year, of a new Head in the School of Public Health (Dr
Sitaleki Finau) boosted the development of a new academic framework for
epidemiology education, including undergraduate and postgraduate
qualifications comprising certificates, diplomas and degrees. Provided this
framework is approved by the Academic Board, FSM should start implementing
it as from next academic year. PPHSN training could well fit into the new
framework, especially regarding the master’s (and undergraduate diploma
and certificate) in applied epidemiology. Field supervision of the students
should not, ultimately, be an impossible matter to solve. The
issue of cross-crediting was discussed in regard to the two training modules
already developed at SPC and the third one ready to be implemented. As
already agreed by both PPHSN partners, defining specific learning objectives
and assessment methods would allow for cross-crediting. The
accreditation issue (of a PPHSN FETP) was also discussed. TEPHINET intends
to define minimum standards for FETPs. It was noted that these should be
considered and that FSM and the PPHSN should join TEPHINET in the future. PPHSN-CB
members acknowledge the development of the higher levels of education in
epidemiology but would like to stress that, nevertheless, the PPHSN (SPC and
others) must also continue to provide basic courses across the public health
workforce. The
CB members are in favour of organising a regional meeting soon of key
providers and institutional partners on public health surveillance training
as part of the PPHSN training development strategy. The
use of Pacific-based case studies as training instruments should be
encouraged. PPHSN
and NCDs
As
has always been envisaged in principle,non-communicable
diseases (NCDs) surveillance should be included into the PPHSN framework in
the near future. CB members would need to look carefully, though, at the
resources issues that such an expansion of the PPHSN's scope of activities
would trigger. An
NCDs initiative by AusAID together with the Fiji School of Medicine and WHO
(STEPS) was launched last year. So far, it has included four PICTs: Fiji
Islands,
Samoa, Federated States of Micronesia and Marshall Islands. The
CB members agree to consider the inclusion of NCDs in the PPHSN framework
and requested that WHO and the Fiji School of Medicine draft a discussion
paper on the pros and cons and the options for widening PPHSN activities,
and circulate it to all CB members for further consideration. Overview
of the SPC regional database project
Following
Mr Garth Parry's[1]
presentation, the CB members agreed, in principle, to work in close
collaboration with the PRISM project (Pacific Regional Information SysteM).
Further details on this issue will be considered and circulated by a
database committee. International health regulations (IHR) The
WHO IHR revision and the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, GOARN Dr Mike O'Leary
gave
a summary presentation emphasising the links between the various components of
the broader work —
that is, the GOARN, outbreak verification, revision of the IHR and national
capacity building. PPHSN development and the IHRCB members agreed
that the PPHSN-CB Focal Point will contact the WHO Headquarters, through the
CSR (communicable disease surveillance and response)Focal
Point in WHO's Western Pacific regional headquarters,
to inform the relevant people of PPHSN’s interest in pre-testing the new IHR
instruments and framework in PPHSN countries. Further operational details
should be worked out later on, in consultation with PPHSN core members. These
preliminary discussions should encompass the main financial implications of
implementing such a trial and the need for appropriate support. Bioterrorism
initiative
The
bioterrorism project was first discussed at the last Pacific Island Health
Officers Association (PIHOA) meeting, which took place in Majuro, Marshall
Islands, in March 2002. The idea was to submit
to the US government a joint proposal by the U.S.
Affiliated Countries and Territories and regional organisations/institutions, focusing on the regional level of surveillance and
response in relation to potential bioterrorism activities. Within the PPHSN
proposal, Dr Mike O'Leary prepared the part dealing with LabNet development
and Dr Tom Kiedrzynski prepared the sections on surveillance and response
enhancing in general, plus training. PPHSN-CB Focal Point’s role: resources adequacy at stakeWHO's
support and input into the PPHSN-CB especially may be reduced for a while with
Mike's departure to Guam on assignment to CDC/PIHOA.
The current
downsizing of SPC Public Health Surveillance and Communicable Disease Control
section resources — budget reduced by 50% compared to two years ago and
staffing reduced from five to three in the next six months — will obviously
impact on the CB Focal Point work capacity. After discussing
these issues, the CB members expressed their unanimous concern regarding the
sustainability of the work achieved so far and agreed on a series of urgent
measures to be considered, such as: ·
The
CB Focal Point workload should be shared between the CB members more than has been the case in the past, or ·
A
proper strategic plan should be developed in order to seek funding from all possible sources. Extending
PPHSN allied membership
Apparently
some institutions, such as the Pacific Island Health Officers Association, the
Institute of Environmental Science and Research, the Pacific Health Research
Council and James Cook University, have expressed interest in becoming allied
members of the PPHSN. The CB members considered this issue and it was agreed
that the PPHSN-CB Focal Point (SPC) should send letters inviting these
institutions to join the PPHSN. PPHSN
website
URL:
http://www.spc.int/phs/PPHSN The CB members agreed that the newly designed PPHSN website was a good information and promotion tool and that it should be published as soon as possible.
The proposed PPHSN logo was unanimously well received. There was, however, a consensus to add a representation of human beings. Three silhouettes have been included in a revised logo which has been sent to the cores members for their comments.
Departing
CB members
In
his closing remarks, Dr Dennie Iniakwala acknowledged Dr Mike O'Leary’s and
Dr Yvan Souares’s respective contributions to the PPHSN, as both are now
about to sail towards new professional horizons. [1] SPC Statistician.
[ List of participants ] [ Back to IA12 Table of contents ] [ Back to the PPHSN Website ]
|
||||||
|
Last updated on October 24, 2003 |
||||||