RESCCUE is a CCES project. Return to CCES


Regional activities

RESCCUE’s regional activities aim at:

  • Mutual enrichment of project participants and stakeholders;
  • Learning by project leaders and stakeholders throughout the project;
  • Capitalising on and disseminating the results and lessons learnt and replicating the successes; and
  • Providing regional-level technical assistance in areas or using methods falling outside the RESCCUE team’s purview or skills and that operators cannot provide locally.

These activities are what makes RESCCUE a truly regional project that reaches beyond its field activities on pilot sites.

All regional activities listed below follow a common guiding principle: they must be fed by activities undertaken on pilot sites, and conversely be useful to stakeholders involved locally.

Led by EcoAdvisors, this activity aims at exploring opportunities provided by outright purchase, easements and leases as innovative financial mechanisms to protect ecosystems and the services they provide to Pacific people.

Contact: Hari Balasubramanian [email protected]

Context

Land acquisition for conservation and mechanisms that aim at placing a legal restriction on a particular property to limit development or resource use and/or impose certain management practices (conservation easements, deed restrictions, conservation covenants) have been advocated and used internationally by NGOs, foundations, businesses, parastatal and public organizations as mechanisms for conservation – often quite effectively.

Objective

To take stock of recent developments in purchasing, leasing or restricting property rights on land for conservation in the Pacific, bring experience from other regions and lead to a thorough review on the use of such mechanisms for the PICTs. It will then assess the opportunities that land acquisition and easements for conservation may hold for PICTs, with a focus on the countries and territories where RESCCUE operates: Fiji, French Polynesia, New Caledonia and Vanuatu.

Activity

  • Identify, classify and list the different types of mechanisms used internationally and regionally with selected illustrative examples, mostly from the region;
  • Conduct a critical analysis on the effectiveness and challenges met in practical use of such mechanisms, with a particular focus on PICTs examples;
  • Examine the political, legal, socio-economic, cultural and technical feasibility of the development and implementation of such mechanisms in PICTs, with illustrative examples in Fiji, French Polynesia, New Caledonia and Vanuatu;
  • Provide recommendations to foster the development and implementation of such mechanisms in PICTs as appropriate.

Targeted audience

  • Government departments handling planning and budget in the four RESCCUE countries and territories and in other PICTs;
  • Local and international NGOs and media;
  • ODA and CROP agencies;
  • Directly concerned major companies and industry bodies.

This activity is carried out by a consortium consisting of The Biodiversity Consultancy (TBC) as lead consultant with Bio Eko, CDC Biodiversité, Environment Consultants Fiji/NatureFiji-MareqetiViti, Pae Tai – Pae Uta (PTPU), SPREP (PEBACC Project), Te Ipukarea Society, and Golder Associates, as sub-contractors.

Contact: David Wilson – [email protected]

Context

With ever more industrial, mining and tourism projects being developed in the Pacific, environmental assessments (including both strategic environmental assessments for plans and programmes and impact assessments for individual projects) and the associated impact mitigation hierarchy (avoid, minimise, rehabilitate/restore, offset), taken as a coherent whole, are increasingly recognised as useful tools to protect Pacific ecosystems.

Objective

While environmental impact assessments have already received much attention in the Pacific, the mitigation hierarchy has been implemented on a very ad hoc basis and without much exchange of experience. This activity contributes filling this regional gap while allowing the Pacific region to take a more active part in a key conservation debate.

Activity

The activity consists in:

  • Developing a baseline study taking stock of recent developments in the mitigation hierarchy and biodiversity offsets in the Pacific
  • Sharing experience regionally and internationally
  • Producing a set of sub-regional roadmaps to move beyond a project-by-project approach towards strengthened mitigation hierarchy policies and practices in the Pacific so as to achieve the No Net Loss or Net Gain objective.
  • Fostering roadmap implementation in Fiji, French Polynesia and Vanuatu
  • Initiating a regional community of practice

Targeted audience

  • Government departments tasked with implementing the mitigation hierarchy in the four RESCCUE countries and territories and in other PICTs;
  • Local and international NGOs and media;
  • ODA and CROP agencies;
  • Directly concerned major companies and industry bodies.

This activity was implemented by James Comley, Institute of Applied Science at the University of the South Pacific, and Julien Rochette.

Contact: Julien Rochette – [email protected]

 

Context

ICM implementation is based on a wide variety of instruments, including so-called “plans”. ICM plans can be defined as documents that:

  • provide for land-use planning;
  • are part of a long-term strategic vision;
  • aim, including through zoning, to prevent and arbitrate in user conflicts by allocating parts of an area to specific activities or priority uses;
  • may include an action plan;
  • are regularly evaluated and updated; and
  • are designed to contribute to implementing ICM in all or part of a country.

ICM  plans  can  be  documents  labelled  “ICM  Plan”  and  developed  for  just  such  a  purpose,  but  can  also be land-use planning documents that do not specifically mention the term ICM in their titles, or can be climate-change adaptation documents designed for coastal areas. Such documents are ICM plans when they have, first and foremost, the objective of integrating sectoral policies with strategic resource management planning over an extended timeframe.

 

Objective

The activity, jointly conducted under the RESCCUE and INTEGRE projects, aimed to assess the state of the art of ICM plan and to produce guidelines for Pacific Island countries and territories.

 

Activity

ICM experts James Comley and Julien Rochette have produced, between September 2014 and May 2015, two reports.

The first one, based on  an extensive literature  review  and  five  case-studies,  aims  to  identify  lessons  learnt  and  best practices regarding: i) the ICM plan development process; ii) ICM plan content; and iii) the relevant governance mechanisms to be established by or around the ICM plan:

“Integrated Coastal Management plans – Critical review and recommendations for Pacific Island countries and territories”

The second one provides guidance to practitioners on the development, content and governance of ICM Plans (at either national or subnational level). Besides some general advice in these areas a possible step-by-step process is proposed.

“Integrated Coastal Management plans – Guidelines for Pacific island countries and territories”

 

Targeted audience:

  • ICM plan managing operators and government bodies
  • Stakeholders involved in developing ICM plans on the sites
  • All government bodies and ICM projects in the Pacific.

Participation in the Oceans 2015 Initiative

The Oceans 2015 Initiative was designed to provide negotiators and stakeholders at the 21st conference of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) with key information on what the future holds for the oceans depending on international negotiations outcomes. It was led by CNRS-UPMC and IDDRI and supported by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, the Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the BNP Paribas Foundation and the Monégasque Association for Ocean Acidification. R. Billé coordinated work on management options for climate change and ocean acidification, by mobilising, among others, the results of current or past climate change adaptation projects in the Pacific. It helped to explain and demonstrate the links between projects such as RESCCUE and COP 21.

Key outputs

Participation in COP 21

After contributing to preparations for SPC’s participation in COP 21 throughout 2015, the RESCCUE team was on SPC’s delegation to Paris to support member countries during the negotiations and participate in technical events.

Participation in the Ocean Solutions Initiative

A follow-on project from the Oceans 2015 Initiative, the Ocean Solutions Initiative aims at assessing the relative effectiveness and feasibility of the main proposed options relating to (i) how the ocean can contribute to climate change mitigation, and (ii) what we can do to address the impacts of climate change on ocean ecosystems and ecosystem services.

It is led by IDDRI and CNRS-UPMC and supported by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, the Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the BNP Paribas Foundation, the Monégasque Association for Ocean Acidification and the French Global Environment Facility (FFEM).

0

Auteur